is showing up in person with a resume actually a thing now? by Alison Green on February 4, 2026 A reader writes: My brother (Gen Z/millennial cusp) has been out of work (and stuck living back home with my parents) for a while now, and everyone is understandably frustrated with the situation. A couple times my mom (boomer) and I (millennial) have been one-on-one and she’s brought up the situation, and she’s said that she has told my brother to just “go show up in person to places you’d like to get a job at and try to hand in your resume!” Every single one of my millennial instincts is screaming NO NO NO, this is CLASSIC out-of-touch boomer advice from when we were trying to get jobs during the Great Recession. I told my mom that yeah, that doesn’t really work now since it’s not the 1980s, and since it’s literally the classic example of out-of-touch boomers with the job hunt, my brother is probably going to then ignore every other piece of advice you give him. However, my mom’s response was yes, she knows all of that, but she heard recently (like this year) on the news that going in person to hand in your resume out of the blue is actually a good thing now, since it’ll get your resume directly in front of a human and help you avoid the AI filter bots. And she claimed she has a friend whose daughter got her most recent job this way! Every millennial instinct of mine screams NOPE DISREGARD when I hear this touted as job hunt advice, but I know that the AI filters are so impossible to get past now. Is there actually some merit to it? Has everything I thought I knew about job searching changed in the nine years since I last interviewed? It is still not a thing. First, they’re highly likely to just tell you that you need to apply online … because you do in fact need to apply online. As has been the case for a long time now, most organizations use electronic applicant tracking systems. If your application isn’t in there, it’s not getting considered. Second, with the rise in remote work, a ton of people don’t even work at companies’ main addresses anymore. There may not be anyone involved in hiring for the position even physically there. And even if they’re there, they’re generally going to be very busy and aren’t going to come out and talk to you just because you randomly showed up holding a resume — so anyone you do talk to is incredibly unlikely to have anything to do with hiring for that particular job. Third, it will still annoy the crap out of most people involved in hiring and make you look naive/out of touch at best … and at worst, like you don’t think instructions apply to you. Their instructions are there for a reason. You will always hear stories about how one weird job search gimmick worked for someone, but more often than not they’re a bad idea (and the amount of time your brother would put into going door to door with his resume would be far more effective put into networking, or writing a better cover letter, or other things with a bigger pay-off). You may also like:candidate showed up in-person for a Zoom interview "to demonstrate their interest"when a job applicant shows up at your office without an appointmenthow can my resume demonstrate initiative, problem-solving, work ethic, and other qualities? { 151 comments }
my coworker wants to fire a domestic violence survivor by Alison Green on February 4, 2026 A reader writes: Our company works in a building that houses multiple businesses. We share reception and security. Recently, there was a terrible incident where the ex-boyfriend of one of my employees, Sarah, got into the building by booking a job interview with a different company. He then made a beeline for our office instead, and made a huge scene shouting at Sarah, and even tried to hit her in front of all of us. Thankfully, security tackled him before he could hurt anyone, and he’s been arrested. We had a security meeting with reception and the other business managers in the building and have agreed to a shared appointment calendar and other precautions to prevent this from happening in the future. I’ve done my best to support Sarah with what she needs to feel safe here, and she seems to be doing well. The problem is Fred, the other manager in my office. About a week after this incident, I was giving him an update on the steps we were taking in case this man is released and causes further problems. Fred was clearly annoyed and asked me why I didn’t just “solve” the problem by firing Sarah. He went on to claim that Sarah was being unprofessional by “allowing her personal life in the office” and that we were going to a lot of trouble for “just one employee.” This is not the first time he’s said something insensitive about our employees, but this was by far the most egregious comment. I told him that Sarah had done nothing wrong, and that it was our job to provide a safe work environment. He rolled his eyes and visibly tuned out for the rest of the meeting. He hasn’t said anything else since that meeting. But I find it increasingly hard to work with him. I’ve been defaulting to email to communicate with him, even though his office is right next to mine, because I feel gross being in the same room with him. I especially feel icky when I see him chatting in a friendly way to Sarah, knowing what he thinks about the situation. It’s bad enough that I briefly considered looking for a new job, but that would mean Fred would temporarily be in charge of my reports. I’m worried he would actually fire Sarah if he could. How do I address this? I don’t feel like it would be appropriate for me to pull him aside and tell him what I think of his reaction, but I also feel like I’m dropping the ball by not the challenging what he said more directly. Is simply avoiding him as much as possible the most I can do here? I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here. You may also like:dealing with domestic abuse in the workplaceinterview with an employee at an employee assistance program (EAP)I’m worried my coworker is abusing his wife, a chronically late colleague, and more { 150 comments }
my company says no one can take any time off for a full year by Alison Green on February 4, 2026 A reader writes: I work in healthcare IT. Recently, our organization made the decision to switch to a new Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system. I, along with dozens of colleagues, are responsible for building this new EMR to meet our organization’s needs. It’s a months-long process that involves lots of coordinated decision-making across the entire organization. The tentative go-live date for this new system is well over a year from now. Our leadership is telling the entire IT department that no PTO requests will be approved during this time. None of this has been communicated to the department en masse, but it has trickled down to managers, who then relay it to their respective teams. The message from my manager has been, “No PTO will be approved.” When I asked about booking a vacation this summer, the response was, “The go-live date is [specific 2027 date].” Since then, I’ve confirmed that no PTO means no PTO. They’ve said they might be able to grant a day off here or there, depending on project needs. But those decisions would only be made closer to the dates we would want to take off. I have a spouse and small children. The thought of zero vacation for over a year seems really awful to me. (I do think this is only about vacation and not sick time. I don’t think they’re saying if we get sick that we can’t take time off. And we are salaried, so we have been told that we can generally flex our schedules to go to one-off appointments without using PTO. But PTO for vacations is a no-go. ) Many folks in our department are quietly seething, but it doesn’t seem like anyone is willing to bring it up in a large group. Is this something that my company can do? PTO is a part of our compensation package, and we accrue leave every pay period. I am new to this organization, so it’s entirely possible that I am way off-base in thinking that this is a bizarre policy. No, this is absurd. The idea that people should work a full year through with no time off to recharge is ridiculous. And no one can attend a family wedding? A funeral? Be at the birth of their grandchild? All trips of any sort for the year are off the table? Legally, in most states, they can probably do it. California is the exception to that, because California treats vacation time as earned wages and prohibits extreme black-out periods that prevent you from having practical access to the time off. Assuming you’re not in California, the best thing you and your coworkers can do is to push back as a group, pointing out that this is an unacceptable restriction on your use of earned benefits and a massive hit to very routine quality-of-life expectations, that you have lives and commitments outside of work, and that it’s in the organization’s best interest to have well-rested and recharged employees. You said no one seems willing to do that, but why? This is an incredibly normal thing for a group of employees to take issue with and push back on … and if you don’t, you’re going to be stuck with no vacation for a year. Create some friction for your company and make it harder for them to do this. There’s a very good chance that if you push back as a group, they’ll budge. You may also like:my boss won't approve my time off for a video game competitionI can't go on vacation because no temp can meet my boss's demanding expectationshow to speak up as a group at work { 255 comments }
I inherited a team from a terrible manager, job application asked about how anxiety affects your work, and more by Alison Green on February 4, 2026 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. I inherited a team from a terrible manager Thanks to your help, I have a shiny new job. I’ve inherited a team where the last manager, Jane, was a true chaos agent. I’m getting stories of her ignoring staff, not communicating on projects or workload at all, putting the blame on staff to senior manager when projects didn’t happen, drinking too much at work events, inappropriate behavior. All her behavior went unchecked for some years until she was suddenly let go. The team are generally exhausted. There is some anger that they escalated complaints about Jane and nothing was done (until it was). At least one openly says she has PTSD. I am trying to support the team and be an aggressively good manager. I’m being transparent about what I’m working on and how it involves them, consulting with them on planning, giving them clear guidance and timelines and so on. They are being super receptive to everything, and bringing good attitudes to the table because they seem so relieved to have a normal manager. Every single day I’m getting multiple team members say, “Wow, it’s not like it was before” and “Wow, Jane would never have done that” or “Jane always did XYZ, it was awful.” When they say these things, I want to acknowledge what they’ve been through but also not have meetings turn into group therapy sessions. And when the flush of me being not Jane has worn off, I’m sure they will discover some things they don’t like. They won’t get to do whatever they want all day anymore (like they were before) for a start. So how do I best support this traumatized team to get the most out of them and help them move on, and what do I say when they start in on the Jane stories? Visibly being an aggressively good manager (as you’re doing) and time. It’s going to take a while for them to viscerally feel and trust that they’re working in a different situation now and for the stability of that to feel solid. In response to the comments about how things used to be under Jane, try to keep things moving forward in a reasonably upbeat way: “This is what I’ve found to work well” … “I’m always open to feedback if you have it” … “I’m glad this sounds better to you” … “Let’s see how this goes!” … etc. I do think you can be open to some one-on-one venting about what happened in the past — and it might give you useful insights into some of the clean-up you’re going to have to do — but it shouldn’t be a group activity that takes over team meetings; that tends to go off the rails quickly and can keep people mired in the past longer. If you see that happening and redirection doesn’t resolve it pretty quickly, it might be worth addressing directly: “I know this team has had a rough time of it. I’m seeing our meetings start to derail on how things used to be, and while some of that is understandable to process the changes this team has been through, I also want to keep us focused on what we’re doing now.” (That said, if people are really struggling with it, there might be value in one discussion to process it together, for anyone who wants to participate, with the understanding that the team needs to move forward after that.) 2. Application asked about how anxiety affects your work I was filling out a teacher job application and it had a questionnaire that included this question: “In the last period of time, how much has anxiety interfered with your interaction with your team mates?” The answers you could choose from were: * None * Mild; some interactions have been strained, but no serious problems * Moderate, we have complained or accused each other of minor insults or work slip-ups * Severe, I am concerned that anxiety has made it difficult to work effectively as a team * Extreme, I am concerned that my anxiety makes it impossible to work with others on this team Is this question illegal? If you’re in the U.S., it’s illegal. Employers can’t legally ask questions that are designed to suss out the existence of a disability. They could certainly ask questions about your relationships with coworkers and how effectively you’ve worked on a team, but they can’t ask, as they’re effectively doing here, “Do you have anxiety and, if so, how does it show up at work?” 3. I did a huge amount of work to save my team’s butt — and no one has even thanked me My office was changing to a new system in a month after working toward it for over a year, and my manager called me into a meeting, near tears, and told me that the new system had not been set up to create important reports that we desperately need. Our work runs on these reports. We report to auditors and the government using these reports. We track our own data using these reports. Not having them wasn’t an option. She asked if I had any ideas as to what could be done because I’m good with Excel, and if I knew any formulas that could organize this data in the way we needed. I spent weeks designing a sprawling framework that automatically mapped all of our data into six wildly different reports, including some that were requested after the initial meeting as a “want” rather than a “need.” I learned new skills to make this happen and put aside my own work to get it done. I worked late. I analyzed and picked apart the old reports to correct the mapping, even identifying errors in the old reports that needed to be corrected moving forward. It was a ton of work and no one else in my department could have created this, including my manager. It felt like a miracle when I pulled it off. It is now being utilized by all levels of management in my division due to how useful it is. And I never even received a thank you. Now, six months on, it is invariably “my” file when there is an update or correction that needs to be made, but “our” file in every other context. That’s it. I’m not expecting a parade or a promotion, but there hasn’t even been a conversation highlighting that someone at least understands that I pulled our butts out of the fire in a major way. I’m wondering if I’m being too sensitive? I work here. It wasn’t volunteer work; they paid me to do it. But without me, they would have had to delay launch and pay the system designers a whole lot of money to get the result I basically handed to them. Is it wrong to expect a ‘thank you’ for working, even if the task was this far outside of my normal purview? No, you absolutely should have been recognized for going above and beyond and solving a massive problem! That would be true even if it were a normal part of your job; it’s extra true because it wasn’t. You should ask for a raise, and make this a centerpiece of your argument for why you deserve it — both the creation of the system itself, and your ongoing role in keeping it working. 4. My boss’ personality changed after brain surgery I’ve worked for the same boss at the same company for 16 years. During that time, my boss needed brain surgery. It’s been three years since his surgery, and his personality and management style have taken quite a turn for the worse. Instead of the demanding but fair boss I worked with for so many years, he is now harsh and downright mean — to the point that other colleagues will contact me privately after an undeserved public dressing down to ask if I’m okay. Executive leadership has been present for some of these meltdowns and have not intervened. After three very difficult years working with him, I’m looking for another job and it looks like I’m about to get a very welcome offer. But I’m wondering how honest I should be in my eventual exit interview. Should I highlight these personality shifts to HR as a reason for leaving? It doesn’t seem quite fair to my boss, because it is very possible and even likely that these personality changes are due to the brain surgery itself and therefore there is little that can be done to change for the better. All the same, I’ve been shielding the rest of the more junior team from his mercurial moods as best I can and feel guilty quietly leaving them to deal with him in this state. I want to approach this both honestly and compassionately, and any advice is appreciated! Yes, tell HR. Your boss is in a position of power over other people and being abusive to them; it’s not a question of whether or not he can help it, it’s a question of the fact that it’s happening. You can certainly present it through a compassionate lens — specifying that it’s a change since his surgery and you realize it might stem from that — but it would be a significant kindness to the people left behind if you make someone aware that it’s happening. (And while executive leadership has seen some of it, they don’t necessarily know the extent of it.) 5. Leaving after I successfully pass a performance improvement plan I’ve been on a performance improvement plan (PIP) for the past few months (it was paused for a long while) due to poor performance that ended up being caused by a sudden onset of a pretty serious disease. Now that I’m recovering and back at work, my PIP is active again and … well, I’m progressing fine. No major issues, hitting KPIs and not feeling terrible after the work day. Barring any major hiccups, it’s looking like I’ll pass it. I want to relax and get into the groove again but on the other hand, the way the middle levels of the company treated me while I was ill (grandboss and HR), up to and including open mockery in meetings. I still want out. I really love my team but I’ve lost trust in the company. I also have wider issues with the workplace that are more of “we need to all join the union” problems but those don’t really factor into my PIP, they just piss me off. I’m dealing with guilt from wanting to leave, anger from how I was treated, exhaustion from fighting an illness that impacted my life for the better part of two years and the longing to leave to see if I can get a better deal in a new workplace (likely outside of my current high-stress field). Obviously there’s a lot of parts at play here, but is it common to pass a PIP and leave anyway? Is it ethically questionable? It’s in no way ethically questionable to leave after passing a PIP. It would be in no way ethically questionable to leave if the PIP had never happened, either. If you want to leave, you get to leave! Ethics don’t come into it, unless you’re, like, an airline pilot parachuting out of the plane mid-flight. People end up leaving shortly after PIPs all the time — sometimes because they feel poorly treated, but sometimes because the PIP made them realize the job wasn’t a great match (whether due to the work itself or their manager’s expectations, or because the PIP made them feel too much instability, or all sorts of other things). You may also like:where do you start when you inherit a bad employee?I think my bad personality is sabotaging my good workhow do I manage someone with extreme social anxiety who calls out before events? { 183 comments }
I asked to work remotely, and my company is acting like I resigned by Alison Green on February 3, 2026 A reader writes: My employee handbook has a policy where if you want to switch to full-time remote work, you have to give three months notice. My partner is starting grad school and we are planning on moving, so I asked my work to switch me to full-time remote in over three months. The handbook says they may not be able to accommodate this, so I was prepared for the potential “no.” However, after giving the “no,” they met with me and said that as I’m moving in three months and they would not accommodate a shift to remote, I would not be able to work at my company anymore. I continued to express my gratitude and interest in continuing remote if possible, but that I understood. They asked me about my moving date/details, which I did not have on hand just yet. I asked when they would need these details by, they said by the end of the week. (This was Tuesday.) The next day, I received an email asking me to confirm my resignation (which I never gave) and gave me an end date for my work a full month before my requested switch to remote/move. They also wanted to prorate my vacation days and sick time, including a vacation I had already scheduled and gotten approved months before this conversation. This obviously gave me pause, as they seemed to think they could just … take away a month of my employment because I requested remote work. I asked (again) for a few days to consider this, and they pushed me to write in writing that I resigned that day. Instead, I wrote that I will have to resign at the end of the three months if they were unable to accommodate me. Then, I contacted the lawyer in my family, who was helpful in giving me language to reiterate that I never formally resigned and that the conversation had always been about the full three months, not before. Therefore, the two-month end date they gave me would indicate that they were terminating my employment. I sent that and then I contacted a local employment lawyer and am waiting to hear back, which is where I’m at right now. But basically, it feels like I’m being punished for following the rules and would have been significantly better off waiting out the three months and giving my two weeks notice. Either way, I’m officially on the job hunt and really appreciate any thoughts you have. Should I have done anything differently? Well, your employer operated in bad faith. If you were clear that you were moving, it would have been fine for them to say, “Since you’re moving and we’re not able to offer you remote work, our understanding is that you’ll be resigning in three months. Is that correct?” And if you’d been wishy-washy about that and not committed to a plan, it would have been fine for them to say, “We need to be able to plan and start transitioning your projects and hiring a replacement, so we’re going to move forward on the understanding that your last day will be sometime in April.” (If you had responded to that by saying you weren’t set on moving after all … well, then it gets trickier for everyone. Ideally they’d take you at your word about that and just move forward as if nothing had happened. But in reality, then they’d have to worry that you were saying to buy some time while still planning to move or while planning to push again for remote work once the time drew nearer.) So that’s the answer to your question about whether you should have done anything differently: if we had a time machine, I’d say not to present the moving plans as a fait accompli, but rather as something you were just thinking about but weren’t committed to. Then once you knew remote work was a no-go, you could simply give two weeks notice when you were ready to leave, giving you more control over the timing of the departure — whereas now that they know so far in advance that you’re definitely leaving, they’re using the timeline they want, rather than respecting the one you had planned on. However, when your employer’s handbook explicitly indicates they’re open to people switching to remote work and invites employees to give three months notice of their interest, they’re setting everyone up for problems if they respond to the requests they solicited by pushing people out early. It means that coworkers who hear what happened to you won’t take them at their word about this anymore; they’ll instead wonder if asking about working remotely will be converted into an early resignation against their will, and that can’t possibly be what your employer intended when they drafted this policy. You might try pointing that out — saying that you took the policy in the handbook in good faith and you have not resigned. In a different situation you could add that you have no current plans to resign — but since you do, you can’t say that at the same time that you’re complaining about them not operating in good faith. Employment in the U.S. is at-will (unless you’re in Montana) so what they did isn’t illegal, just very crappy. (Although who knows what your employment lawyer might uncover. They can help ferret out any details like that three other people were treated differently in this regard, and the only difference is your race/sex/religion or other factors that could cast this in a different light.) You may also like:when can I ask a potential employer about working remotely?my office says we can keep working from home if we take 5% pay cutsI worked remotely from a friend's house -- and my boss says I have to count it as vacation days { 124 comments }
I was turned down for a raise — now what? by Alison Green on February 3, 2026 A reader writes: I work at a fairly large nonprofit (500+ employees) outside a major city. I’ve been here four years and genuinely like my job, but my compensation has become a major source of stress. I hold a director-level title, supervise 15 part time employees, and earn just enough to qualify as exempt from earning overtime pay. Since starting, I’ve taken on significant additional responsibilities. I regularly work 45-60 hours each week and am expected to be on call for emergencies for eight hours every other weekend. I know nonprofit salaries aren’t high, but I didn’t expect to be 10 years into my career and still living paycheck to paycheck. Recently, I had my annual evaluation and decided to ask for a raise. We get small merit increases each year, but they barely keep up with inflation. I prepared a list of accomplishments and additional duties and researched comparable salaries, mostly government-funded roles with public data. Based on what I found, I’m earning $10,000–15,000 below market. My performance review was glowing. My manager even listed many of my accomplishments before I mentioned them. But toward the end, she said it seemed like I had too much on my plate and wanted to discuss reallocating tasks. To my surprise, I burst into tears. I still managed to explain why I felt I deserved a raise at the end of our conversation, but I know I didn’t present my case as clearly as I’d hoped. My manager took the request to our department head. Yesterday I was told my compensation was “deemed to be sufficient.” I’m shocked and hurt. I didn’t expect them to match the salaries I found, but I did expect something. The reasons I was given had nothing to do with my performance. First, the usual “no wiggle room in the budget.” Second, they said my salary research wasn’t relevant because the positions I found were closer to the city and might not have comparable benefits, even though the cost of living there is similar and there are no other jobs in our town like mine to compare to. Third, they said there’s no clear evidence I’ve taken on additional responsibilities because there’s no job description on file. To my manager’s credit, she immediately started working on the job description issue. The person who hired me retired a year after I started, and her files are a mess. Her replacement, my current boss, has never been able to find my original job description. Still, I’m frustrated. My compensation doesn’t match my role, and the reasons for denying a raise had nothing to do with my work. I also wasn’t given any guidance on how to advocate for myself in the future. At the same time, I don’t feel like I have leverage because I don’t intend to leave since my field has an especially terrible job market. I’m not sure what to do next. Some of the conversations about reducing my workload seem promising, but that doesn’t solve the compensation issue. I’ve thought about refusing overtime since I’m not compensated for it, but I know that could backfire since evening and weekend hours are common in my industry. Is there anything else I can do, or re my only real choices to accept my current salary or look for another job? You can read my answer to this letter at New York Magazine today. Head over there to read it. You may also like:I turned down a job, and now people are devastatedmy coworker asked out a coworker, got turned down, and now won't stop badmouthing herI turned down a bait-and-switch job offer and now they're blowing up my phone { 79 comments }
my boss says it’s unprofessional to ask a coworker for a tampon by Alison Green on February 3, 2026 A reader writes: I am not sure how to handle this situation. It has made a couple of coworkers and me uncomfortable and honestly just doesn’t make sense. Situation: A female coworker was in the bathroom. She started her period that day but didn’t have any feminine hygiene products at work. She texted me, asking if I could bring her a pad or tampon. I grabbed a pad, walked to the staff bathroom, and handed her the pad under the stall wall. Our boss somehow heard what happened and got very upset. The boss told me that was incredibly unprofessional, she would NEVER give a coworker a feminine hygiene product, and even called a meeting with five other people to discuss me giving a pad to someone. She spent half an hour trying to convince the others that my action was unprofessional, and went so far as to start writing a new workplace policy. She insists that, if someone doesn’t bring a feminine hygiene product into the bathroom when they need it, it is their fault, they deserve to have the mess in their clothes, and they will have to go home to get cleaned up and changed. According to her, it is more professional for that person to leave work to change, than to ask a coworker for a pad or tampon. It is also more professional to ignore a request for a pad or tampon. I truly do not understand what the problem is. Why is it so bad to give someone a pad? Why is it better for someone to take unplanned time off work in the middle of the day, lose pay, cause us to be short-staffed, and increase the workload and stress of their coworkers? Wouldn’t it be more unprofessional to leave a coworker stranded in the bathroom (causing them stress and embarrassment from stains on their clothes and having to ask to leave work)? Does this fall under sex discrimination? Or is it just an incredibly out-of-touch boss? I don’t know how to handle this, especially if she does actually start a workplace policy regarding feminine hygiene products. You don’t understand what the problem is because the problem is no more and no less than your boss being out of her fricking mind. It is utterly normal and unremarkable to need a feminine hygiene product and ask a coworker for one. Your boss’s reaction to this — that it is an outrage and she would never give someone a tampon — is outlandish and disconnected from every social and professional norm out there. Would she also not ask someone to hand her some toilet paper if her stall was out of it? And refuse to give some to someone else if asked? Your boss has some seriously deep-rooted and punitive issues around menstruation and women’s bodies, and probably around women in general. (You deserve to spend the day in bloody clothes?!) She also has no clue about how normal people behave. It’s unlikely there’s anything illegal here (other than that her lack of common sense should be criminal) but this is absurd and offensive. Is your boss the head of your entire company or does anyone have authority over her? If she’s not the CEO or owner, you should go over her head — to HR if you have it, or to her boss if you don’t — and ask them to shut this down decisively. If she is the owner, you should all just ignore her and, if confronted over your shocking tampon exchanges, tell her that people’s private bathroom behavior isn’t up for discussion. You may also like:can I send a male assistant to get me tampons?our new manager is pressuring the women on our team to use menstrual cupscan I keep mentioning my period at work? { 797 comments }
should I take a job with my politician brother, retreats are full of physical activities I can’t do, and more by Alison Green on February 3, 2026 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. Should I take a job with my politician brother? My brother is running for local office as a Democrat in our very blue state. I think he has a great shot at winning, and not just saying that because he is my brother. This district has swung very blue since 24. His GOP opponents are definitely beatable. My state has no rules or guidelines on nepotism in office. So if he wins, and he probably can, I will almost certainly be offered something in his office. I will almost certainly be offered some office in his campaign, as well. Should I take it? On the one hand, it’s working for the family in a huge pressure cooker. On the other hand, it’d be a great experience, and it’s not just a family business. He and I also get along pretty well. Unless it crashes and burns, which could be detrimental. Do you have any advice about what questions to ask myself or him to decide if this would work? Or any guidelines we should set in place if I do decide to do this? Eh. Do you want to be a nepotism hire, with all that comes with that — like people assuming that you got the job because of your brother and not on merit, colleagues not being candid around you because it might get back to your brother, and — if it’s a job you couldn’t get without the family connection — potentially being responsible for work you don’t have the professional seasoning to do as well as someone experienced could do? And that’s before we even get into the personal complications of working with family, including changing the nature of your relationship with your brother? Some people clearly calculate that those trade-offs are worth it to them, but those are the factors I’d try to look at as realistically as possible. More here: should I take a job working for my dad? I am the nepotism hire who no one likes 2. Our retreats are full of physical activities I can’t do I work at an organization that’s full of outdoorsy people, and most employees work outside at least once a week. I have an admin position and almost always work indoors, at home. This is great for me because I have fibromyalgia and don’t have very much energy for outdoor, physical work. I have trouble standing for long periods of time and have passed out or almost passed out several times in the past while working outside. However, we have staff retreats several times a year, and they are often set outside and involve a lot of physical activity (hiking, kayaking, etc.). Sometimes I am able to do these activities, and sometimes I’m not. Attendance is required, although it’s not really clear what the consequences would be if we skipped them. Most of my coworkers relish these retreats and often say how glad they are that we have them outside. The retreats give me a lot of anxiety, because I either won’t be able to do the physical activities, or they will likely cause a flare-up and I’ll have to take time off to recover. I worry that if I ask for some alternatives that are less physical/indoors, my coworkers will resent me. This is especially the case for our team retreats, because our team is small and it wouldn’t make much sense for us to split up to do separate activities, so everyone would end up doing something less physical/indoors. My boss is aware of my fibromyalgia and I have told him that I really struggle with outdoor activities, but since I haven’t needed to formally ask for accommodations (because my core responsibilities don’t require outdoors work) he hasn’t made any changes to our retreats. How can I ask for what I need without putting a damper on the retreats for the rest of my team? Bring it up now, before the next one is announced, and say this to your boss: “While I’ve tried to make it work in the past, for health reasons I won’t be able to participate in the physical activities at retreats from now on, like kayaking or hiking. Would it be better for me to not attend, or could we start planning retreats that don’t center around those types of activities?” Alternately, if you prefer to attend and just want different activities, reword that last sentence to, “I get a lot of value out of attending, so could we look at activities that don’t require those physical abilities?” You might also add, “I imagine at some point we may hire others with similar restrictions, and I know we want to be as inclusive as we can.” If being more inclusive makes your coworkers resentful … well, first, your boss should own this decision himself, not attribute it to you. But also, this is part of working with other people, and they’ll need to get over it! They are free to kayak and hike in their off hours as much as they’d like. 3. Should we stop suspending people without pay before firing them? My employer’s corrective action plan states that any employee who is issued a final warning (the last step before termination) serves an immediate one-day unpaid suspension. The reasoning is stated to be to emphasize the seriousness of the offense. Recently, I’ve had to enact this policy for someone who has repeatedly violated our attendance policy. I have brought up the fact that it seems pretty silly to suspend someone for not coming to work, and our admin team seems to agree and we may be altering this policy. In your opinion, are these sort of punitive policies effective or necessary? To me it seems a bit demeaning and assumes our employees aren’t mature enough to understand the consequences of their actions and a bit cruel as we’re weaponizing people’s pay/livelihoods against them. Also, it ends up being a logistical nightmare figuring out how employees are going to serve said suspensions without affecting business operations. Yeah, you should get rid of the one-day unpaid suspension policy. It’s purely punitive, and the entire concept of “punishment” doesn’t belong at work. There should be natural consequences when people badly mess up, which could be anything from getting less autonomy or less flexibility all the way to losing the job — but those consequences should be the logical result of whatever the problems were, not punishment imposed for punishment’s sake. If your company’s managers are managing well — setting clear expectations, giving clear feedback, and addressing it forthrightly when someone’s not meeting the bar they need — that should be all they need. 4. I joined the DEI council and they’re asking me for way too much I work at a large academic medical center and I joined a DEI council at work for staff members across the institution. I was originally told it was a small commitment (on the level of 7-8 hours a month) and it seemed like a good way to connect with people and help out with causes that are important to me. That does not feel like what I got. I joined a project subcommittee and was handed a project plan to rework that involved organizing equity trainings across the college. The plan was no longer viable as it was several years old. Then it came up a couple of months after we started that the institution would not be able to support creating or facilitating any training sessions, and we would have to shift to something else instead. The way this news was announced by the liaison to the administration made me think it was a known constraint that we weren’t made aware of at the outset. This something else is likely a resource website, but it appears that my group will have to start from zero and develop all the content ourselves. And I am absolutely not qualified to do that in any way! I am a data analyst for a research lab whose only relevant experience is being part of a marginalized community. And it would be a huge time sink to do it justice. The other subcommittees seem like less effort, focusing on engaging the full committee and doing some minor event planning (think panel discussions and holiday celebrations). Is their expectation for the project reasonable under these circumstances? And assuming it is unreasonable, do you have any suggestions on how to get out of it? I technically made a two-year commitment and I’m on month six. Nope, it’s not reasonable — but even if it were, you’d still be able to explain you didn’t realize that was what you were signing up for and that unfortunately it’s not work you’re able to do. That’s the framing I’d use here: “I’m sorry, my understanding was that I was signing up for seven or eight hours a month doing things like XYZ. This project is significantly larger and not one I am equipped to take on — and it’s important enough that it should be done by someone qualified to do it. I’m happy to stay on the larger council if you’d like me to, but I need to step down from this subcommittee.” 5. Resigning when I’m on my honeymoon I’m interviewing for a job I’m really hopeful for and it’s going well! My third interview (meeting the team) is tomorrow. My concern is about leaving my current job. Next week I’ll leave for my three-week honeymoon. If I get a job offer while I’m on vacation, what’s the best way to handle this? Do I submit my resignation ASAP? Submit it the second I return and work for two more weeks, assuming my new job would even be okay with that? For what it’s worth, I am doing my best to leave a list of instructions for “while I’m on vacation” that doubles as instructions for “while I’m gone forever.” My potential new job is already aware of my travel dates and is not concerned about that affecting my start date. And I’m honestly kind of desperate to run out the door from my current job. One option is to feel out the new job on how comfortable they’d be with you pushing your start date back enough that you could still work one to two weeks at your current job after you return, in order to help transition your work. A lot of employers would be completely fine with that (and would hope their employees would do the same in your situation). If you can do that, that’s the best option. But if they can’t be flexible on that (and there can be legitimate reasons for that) and you’re not going to be able to give much or any notice, then yes — you’d contact your boss from your vacation, apologize for the timing and say you know it’s not ideal, but you didn’t want to wait until you got back so that they could have the maximum possible notice. You may also like:my office loves expensive, physically demanding team-building activitiesmy employee was excluded from a team-building event because of their weight -- how do I make this right?my brother is my business partner and he keeps going MIA { 194 comments }
is it unprofessional to avoid being alone with a coworker who I don’t trust? by Alison Green on February 2, 2026 A reader writes: I’ve read your stuff on why it’s problematic for supervisors to avoid one-on-one meetings with supervisees, but what about peer coworkers? One of my coworkers, “Ariel,” makes me uncomfortable because she tends to assume the worst possible version of what someone says or project a different version entirely. Any disagreement with her, even about the most abstract issues phrased delicately and professionally, is taken personally. She also tends to assume (and share verbally) that the only motives anyone could have for even a slightly different opinion from hers is bigotry or unintelligence. Part of this seems to stem from her having preemptively decided (and expressed in nearly such terms) that everyone in our (largely conservative) region of the country is backwards, bigoted, and unintelligent, especially relative to the more progressive region she’s from. It’s like she decided we were racist/sexist/homophobic because of being in/from this region and is looking for proof of her thesis. She’s proclaimed out of the blue that there are no critical thinkers in our region, and has asserted several times that there is/was no activism (anti-racism, LGBTQ stuff, immigrant-related) in our region that famously has (and had) lots of it. We actually have a very liberal department that frequently centers a variety of civil rights and social justice issues. For example, if we are “Camelid Studies,” we have speakers, books, and faculty who study the impact of camels on the environment, alpacas on immigration, llamas and LGBTQ+ safety, etc. Both faculty and students are pretty open about their progressiveness, but Ariel seems not to read, hear, or see any of that or any nuance relating to our region. On several occasions, she has interpreted incredibly innocuous, bland, or uncontroversial things to be offensive in some way or heard the exact opposite of what someone was saying. The reactions she has are not limited to one person or one setting. Given how she mishears people in groups, I don’t want to be alone with her and end up misquoted something ugly. It’s dehumanizing and obnoxious how she treats people who aren’t from HerProgressiveHomeRegion with her exact views expressed the exact same way, but more importantly, I don’t want to get bit by an allegation alligator that I said something horrible with no witnesses to back me up. Even if nothing comes of it, I don’t want to start my career with reputational baggage in the air. To be clear, I do not supervise Ariel, nor she me, and there is no possibility of either. We are in a graduate program, I came in (and will likely finish) before her, and our positions are peers. I’m not responsible for her professional or academic growth in any capacity. Is it unprofessional of me to never be alone with her? To be clear, I have no intention of discussing this with anyone in my office, just finding ways to limit my own risk exposure. If it would be problematic, how else can I manage the next few years of having a coworker who always hears the worst? It’s not unprofessional to avoid being alone with Ariel, as long as it doesn’t end up interfering with your work, her work, or your team’s work or creating a weird working environment for others. If you’re coming up with complicated workarounds to avoid talking to her, or if you’re avoiding her in other obvious ways that make bystanders uncomfortable, that would be a problem. But if you’re just strategically avoiding being alone with her in ways that don’t raise eyebrows in people watching, you’re fine. If this were a more traditional workplace and not a graduate program, I’d suggest you also talk to your manager about what you’ve noticed to make sure they’re aware of it. A manager should be concerned about the dynamics Ariel is creating, and should hear how she’s affecting people (to the extent that at least one person doesn’t feel safe being around her without a witness). And you could still do that in a graduate program too, but there tends to be … less management in that context, to say the least. So simply steering clear of Ariel as best as you can may be the best and most effective option. But this is different from managers who refuse to be alone with the people they manage — which in theory is doable, but in practice tends to be male managers avoiding being alone with female employees, and only female employees, which then disadvantages the women who work for them because it means they get less access to feedback, mentoring, and relationship-building than their male colleagues do. You’re not Ariel’s manager (and if you were, you’d be much better positioned to address the concerns you have with her), there’s no power dynamic in play, and you’re not obligated to give her the kind of access to you that would be a bigger deal to withhold if you were her boss. You may also like:some men in my office refuse to be alone with womencan I refuse to be alone with a coworker who I had an emotional affair with?my coworker is working alone overnight despite explicit instructions not to { 269 comments }
how to respond when a candidate discloses a disability in an interview by Alison Green on February 2, 2026 A reader writes: A colleague and I were recently interviewing candidates for an entry-level position and, at the beginning of one of the interviews, the candidate asked if they could disclose something before we got started, then said that they were on the autism spectrum. My colleague jumped in and explained that while they appreciated the candidate’s desire for transparency, we shouldn’t know that up-front because legally we cannot deny employment to someone on the basis of any kind of medical diagnosis, and including that information during an interview makes everything much more complicated. My colleague and I debriefed after the interview, and we ultimately decided not to move forward with this candidate because the role didn’t match up well with their career plans in the near future, and the type of work environment that they said they were interested in was at odds with the environment we offer (they wanted something fairly independent and structured, whereas our environment relies heavily on collaboration, and schedules/workflows can change pretty quickly). I feel like we did our best to base our hiring decision solely on what the candidate was looking for and whether or not they’d be able to perform the required tasks, and not on their stated diagnosis, but I was uneasy. I was wondering if you had any suggestions on how to handle this situation if it comes up again in the future. I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here. Other questions I’m answering there today include: How can I signal that I’m not the bottleneck? Who should initiate a LinkedIn connection, manager or employee? You may also like:when should I tell an interviewer I need disability accommodations?I don’t want to interview a candidate who took 5 days to respondinterview with an employee at a majority-autistic company { 146 comments }