weekend open thread – May 30-31 2026

Wallace and Stella

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand.

Here are the rules for the weekend posts.

Book recommendation of the week: The sequel to Hench is out — Villain, by Natalie Zina Walschots. If you haven’t read Hench, read that first: it’s about a woman who works very boring temp jobs for supervillains. In Villain, she has ascended to a sort of second-in-command position and is working to destroy the organization that manages the world’s superheroes. Once again, there is an incredible hilarity in juxtaposing the mundanity of office work against a backdrop of working for supervillains … but it’s much, much more than that. I loved it. (Also, someone made an Ask a Manager/Hench mash-up!)

(Amazon, Bookshop)

* I earn a commission if you use those links.

open thread – May 29, 2026

It’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer.

poop emoji in a rejection email, is it rude to ask people to move when hot-desking, and more

It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go…

1. Poop emoji in a rejection email

I enjoy jokes at work, and am partial to self-deprecating humor, but recently I got a rejection email from a company that has a grinning poop emoji in the subject line.

Am I crazy for thinking that emoji just doesn’t belong in any bad news email — especially one that people can take personally or can be hard to hear, like a rejection? The job market sucks right now.

To be fair, they’re a company that does overtly use potty jokes in their marketing communications and even in the HR materials I read, so I wasn’t wholly surprised to see it, but it seemed, well, tacky. I don’t need an emoji to find the 💩 in that email!

Am I out of touch? Does consistent corporate branding take precedence over a bit of respect? Should I be grateful to even get so much as an automated poop emoji from companies these days? I spent over an hour applying for that job on my weekend!

You’re not out of touch. A poop emoji doesn’t belong in a rejection email. It’s making light of a message that the recipient is likely to take far more seriously and might be deeply disappointed by. It’s just the wrong tone for the message.

It does make it better that it’s from a company that has built a lot of their marketing materials around potty jokes (is this a poop-related company?! I must know) because it’s consistent with their branding — but even so, it doesn’t belong in a rejection email, just like it wouldn’t belong in a message they were sending announcing an employee’s death (obviously that’s much further along the continuum of insensitive messaging, but it’s still part of the same continuum).

To be clear, some people might enjoy it! But enough won’t that whatever’s gained by it is outweighed by what’s lost. 💩

2. Is it rude to ask people to move when hot-desking?

I work for a hybrid organization that hot-desks. Each team has a core day when they must be in the office. Desks are set up in sections and teams usually sit together in “their” section on their core day. Sitting with my team is what makes in-office days valuable because of the collaboration.

Recently I came in on our core day to find someone else sitting in our section, but there was still enough space for my team. Another person from their team came to join them (not enough space anymore) and I asked that person if they could sit somewhere else, since my team would be in and sitting there. They said sure and went over to a different section.

My manager then told me that I couldn’t tell people to move and because my team gets in later in the morning because they have kids, they have to just deal with whatever desks they can get and that she would be really annoyed if someone asked her to move when they got in later than her.

For me personally, I wouldn’t be bothered if I was in a team’s section on their core day and they asked me to move so they’d have enough seats. Am I off-base here? Is it inappropriate/rude to (politely) ask someone to move so your team can sit together when hot-desking?

Important info: I’m at the same level as the person I asked to move. The desks are not all set up the same; our section is set up according to my team’s needs and the other sections aren’t (and we’re told to just request the office managers set them up if we need to use another desk). They weren’t using the specific set-up of our section.

I don’t think it’s particularly rude in a vacuum, but it depends on the culture of your organization. In offices where desks are first come, first served and you can’t reserve desks for others, it might feel rude. In other orgs, it would be no big deal, particularly since the desks you were claiming were set up in a specific way for your team (and particularly if you explained that).

Since the feedback came from your manager, I’d figure she’s probably right about the general expectations in your particular org — although who knows, it’s also possible these are just her personal feelings and most other people there don’t care.

3. Can I exercise at my desk in an open office?

I’ve started to develop knee problems over the last few years, and have been advised to focus on strengthening the muscles around my knees to prevent further problems. Some of the recommended exercises are simple and low-impact enough that I can do them while sitting at my desk (like repeatedly extending my leg straight out from a seated position). However, I’m a bit self-conscious about doing them at work in the open office where the desks are not enclosed. I generally try to do them when nobody is close enough to see to avoid distraction, but am curious whether this is generally considered acceptable since I haven’t seen others doing it. How would you approach this?

The big things you want to think about are (a) whether you’re going to look like you’re not focused on work for long stretches and (b) whether you’ll create a lengthy visual distraction for people around you who are trying to focus.

Something like repeatedly extending your leg while seated should be fine to do, even in an open office (as long as you’re not going to, like, trip someone who’s passing by). If your leg mostly remains under the desk and you’re still in your chair, exercise away. Things that would be more of an issue in many offices: your leg on the desk, you on the floor, martial arts stances.

4. When in an interview process should I ask about working remotely?

I graduated last year and I just landed an interview for a research position I really, really want. It’s a term-limited role for two years, and I’m planning on using it to my advantage when applying to graduate schools if I get an offer. The research fits into the specialty I studied during my undergrad, and as a bonus, it seemingly pays better than other research positions offered by other universities. (That’s not to say it pays particularly well — but this is to be expected for American universities facing funding crises under the current administration.)

The problem is the commute. The commute is 1 hour and 20 minutes one-way on a good day. I was offered the interview so I’ll go, and I’m pretty sure if I get a job offer from them, I won’t get a better one from anyone else because other universities are at a similar distance to me and pay less. (I don’t have any other offers at the moment, so this point is moot.) I felt comfortable applying to this position since it was advertised as a hybrid role, so I figured I could work from home and head in a few times a week, but I learned from the initial phone interview that they plan on making it a fully on-site role in the future.

But regardless of whether the position is on-site or hybrid, a lot of my duties can be done remotely. How and when should I bring this up, and is there a way to negotiate for me to work the schedule I’d prefer? I thought I might have some leeway because it’s a limited role, I won’t get opportunities for advancement because it’s intended for people taking a gap year, and it was advertised as a hybrid role.

I really liked the project manager from the phone screen I had with her the other day, but I don’t want to waste their time in case I can’t do the commute. That’s the only thing that would prevent me from taking this job. I’d move, but at the moment, I have no money since I’ve been unemployed and living at home since I graduated. Do I have any options?

If this weren’t a two-year, term-limited role, I’d tell you it’s a bad idea to try this because even if they agree to full-time remote, they could end up concluding it’s not working for them and you have to come in after all, or it could lead to you not getting the same opportunities and consideration as other people who are there on-site. Frankly, I’d still have some of those concerns; it’s two years, not two months, and that’s plenty of opportunity for things to go wrong. More on that here.

If being on-site is absolutely a dealbreaker, though, you can certainly ask about it. I’d do it sooner rather than later so that you don’t waste your or their time going through their process if it’s not something they can be flexible on. You could say, “I’m really excited about the position but because I’m about 90 minutes away it would be tough to work on-site five days a week. Would you be open to keeping the role hybrid?”

But also … if you’ve been unemployed since you graduated and aren’t feeling great about other prospects, moving closer to this job might be the most practical thing to do.

the interns I’m mentoring don’t want my help

A reader writes:

I am mentoring my third summer intern (in a company program that assigns mentors and mentees), and I’m facing a frustrating trend: none of them seem to want my help.

I want to be a supportive mentor, but I keep running into walls. My current intern spends our 1-on-1s exclusively selling himself, never asking questions or listening. My previous intern refused to practice her end-of-summer presentation with me or take my feedback before pitching to executives. The intern before that turned down a great internal job interview because the role wasn’t “perfect.”

Given how tough the entry-level market is right now, I’m confused by the resistance. Is there a new professional dynamic with Gen Z interns that I’m failing to understand, or have I just hit a bizarre statistical anomaly? How do you mentor people who don’t seem to want it?

I don’t think it’s new — I’ve been getting letters with similar themes since time immemorial (i.e., 2007). It’s not generational; it’s about inexperience and lack of professional judgment borne of that inexperience.

When you initially meet with the interns, make sure you’re laying out what you can offer, how your meetings should work, and what you should both expect from the time together. (Ideally your company would also be doing that before these meetings ever happen.) From there, it’s really up to them whether they want to take advantage of the time.

It’s okay for the intern who didn’t want to practice her presentation or take your feedback to make that call — although at that point I’d ask her how the time could be useful to her and what she’d like to get out of your meetings.

With the guy who’s spending the time selling himself, interject!  You’re the mentor and you’re allowed to have input into how your time is used. It’s okay for you to say, “The best way for us to use this time is XYZ, so before we next meet, spend some time thinking about questions about your work or company culture that you’d like us to discuss.” And then if he keeps pitching himself anyway, you can interject and explicitly redirect him.

But also, talk to whoever organizes your company’s mentoring program and tell them what your experience has been so far. They may have guidance for how you should handle it, and they might want to be alerted when it happens so they can check in with the interns. They also might be able to change how they’re presenting the program so that interns are going in with a better understanding of how it’s expected to work.

my employee lied for months about work he wasn’t really doing

A reader writes:

I have a small team of developers working under me. We were working on building a new product for our start-up. The main full stack engineer who was building the web interface had been working on it for two months and regularly giving us fake status updates. During this time, we even sponsored him to come to our country from Peru. Now after two months of living here, he just came up yesterday and says that he is leaving for a better company, and he says that he didn’t complete anything on that web portal in the last two months.

I realize that I dropped the ball by not checking out the demo and I shouldn’t have just believed him. But we are working in a very small start-up so there is a huge load divided among us. I am not sure what my options are now. I know I can’t stop him from joining that company. Can we take legal action here?

I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • Should I warn a vendor about our difficult IT director?
  • My company overuses “reply all”

let’s discuss conference speaker fails

A reader writes:

Could you please start a Thursday Thread about keynote speaker fails?

Not long ago, our large public library system had its annual staff development day. In the past, we’ve had board presidents, scholars, and community leaders deliver the keynote address. This year, our executive director announced from the podium that they had directly chosen the speaker, after having met them at a local morning news program. The speaker had lost her daughter and husband to a murder/suicide and was now marketing this tragedy as a social media-based lifestyle/self-help company. Did it occur to our director that one of our staffers had lost a child to suicide, that others could have had their own personal tragedies, that the whole thing might be triggering for some, or that many prefer to grieve in private? Apparently not! The keynote speech could have been worse, but it also could have been better. Almost none of what this speaker had to share was public library-related; rather the broad theme was “resilience.”

At the end of the keynote’s talk two things happened: First, our trauma influencer took a bunch of smiling selfies with her social media team. Second, the hundreds of staffers in attendance were directed to think about a loved one and to use the speaker’s branded postcards (complete with QR codes to her website) to write to that person. On the spot. We were told these would be collected and library admin would provide postage and mail them for us. Some staff did as they were instructed, but many were so uncomfortable with the situation that they left their cards blank. The kicker: our executive director — the person who hand-picked this trainwreck of a speaker — spent most of the keynote visibly playing Pokémon Go on their phone.

Why limit ourselves to keynote speakers when we’ve also got the motivational speaker who got drunk and went off the rails (and who talked about balancing work, health, and sex), the speaker who went on so long that everyone got food poisoning, and the very relatable speaker who, immediately after her presentation, let out a loud “UGH MY GODDDDD, BLECHHH,” not realizing her microphone was still on.

In the comments, please share your own story of conference speaker fails!

coworker is constantly on loud phone calls, I don’t want to give a reference, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My coworker is constantly on loud phone calls when I need to focus

I am a researcher at a university, and I share bench space with another person from a different lab. They tend to be extremely loud and constantly on phone calls, either work-related or personal ones. It’s usually not a big deal if colleagues or advisors come in to talk a bit of research, but her calls go on forever as she’s either interviewing others or taking work calls. And my research includes a lot of reading and writing, for which this has become an unsuitable environment.

I’ve expressed to her multiple times that she should take calls elsewhere and it’s met with either, “Where though? There’s no conference room free” or being ignored. It’s not really my job to find her one and I think it’s basic decency to not come into a shared workspace if she’s constantly on calls with a booming loud voice such that my noise-cancelling headphones are deemed useless. How do I address this without going to my manager, who already has a lot on their plate as a new manager?

You have clashing needs for the space, but that doesn’t mean that her needs are wrong, just incompatible with yours. It’s reasonable for her to figure she can make work calls in her assigned workspace. If she’s making a lot of personal calls on top of that, that’s inconsiderate — but it sounds like much of this is about her work conversations and if she’s right that there’s no other obvious place for her to make them, that puts both of you in a bind.

I know you’d prefer not to take this to your manager, but that’s really the right next step — your workspace isn’t working well for your needs (because you need quiet for deep focus and your colleague needs to produce almost constant noise). Explain that and ask if you can move to a different space.

2. I don’t want to give a reference to someone who’s posted crappy things on Facebook

A decade ago at a former job, I hired an employee with no experience managing affordable housing, but with transferrable skills. She shared her experience with domestic violence and resulting homelessness and she talked about how she could relate to someone’s situation not defining their future. During her tenure, her family experienced additional trauma, and she cited the generous leave and other supports the org gave as being helpful for her family’s healing. When she outgrew her role and started looking for a new job in a different industry, I gave her a glowing reference and offered to do so again if the new job didn’t work out. She friended me on Facebook, we did the normal liking of each other’s posts, but didn’t connect otherwise. In the eight years since she left, she’s texted me twice to tell me she put me down as a reference for a job. Both times, the job called me the same day and I gave positive references.

About a year ago, I started noticing her Facebook posts were mocking people who use the social service system. I didn’t engage, just unfriended her. Last week, she sent a text telling me she used me as a reference again. Before I could even think about how I was going to respond to her, the potential employer (who also happens to support defunding most social services) called. I just ignored the request. Over the week, she followed up and tried to reach me through various social apps and called a shared former colleague. The only thing she hasn’t done is reach out to me at my job where I’ve worked for the past five years – I don’t think she knows I work here.

I should have just told her I don’t feel comfortable being a reference since we don’t know each other anymore. But at the same time, who just gives old numbers without checking in with the reference? Is there a time limit on reference giving? How could I have handled this situation better?

A surprisingly high number of people offer up references without checking in with the reference, and just assume that a previous “yes” lasts forever. (And actually, a surprisingly high number of people offer up references without even getting the initial “yes.”) They should check in — because you could be dead or living with wolves in a forest or otherwise unreachable, or you might feel too much time has gone by to still be able to give a nuanced reference, and also because if you’re not prepared for the call, you might draw a blank on details when asked for information. But despite that, a lot of people still don’t.

Ideally when she texted you, you would have told her you didn’t feel well positioned to still provide a reference for her. It’s up to you whether you wanted to explain why (personally I would have, but you’re not required to; she made her own bed) or just tell her too much time had passed for you to recall sufficiently useful details. But ignoring the request also sends a message that isn’t unwarranted, given this particular set of circumstances.

3. Is managing AI agents the same as managing people?

I’m attending a tech industry conference for work, which is of course overwhelmingly centered around AI agents and tools. One of the speakers said that a first-time manager may be a manager of AI agents instead of people. It seems like this would set a lot of first-time managers up to fail when they eventually manage real people.

I wondered what your thoughts were on this perspective. Have you seen or heard others implying managing AI agents and managing people is equal?

No! And that is bananas. That’s like saying that managing a garden is the same as managing people, or that managing an equipment fleet is the same as managing people. Managing AI may be a particular skill set, but it is not the same skill set as managing humans. AI agents aren’t going to (or at least aren’t supposed to) get sick, be cranky, take something personally, be defensive, feel they need more appreciation, or any of the other many, many characteristics and challenges that come with managing people. (I was going to say they also aren’t going to have their own independent agendas, but that’s apparently not true.)

4. Coming in as a new manager to an existing team

I work in a hospital as deputy manager of a large administrative team. I have been offered a new role in the hospital on a 12-month contract to cover maternity leave. This will be a step up to manager with my own deputy. The new team does the same work for a different healthcare specialty, so my skills are transferable.

It’s important to me to be an effective people manager. To do this, I need to know about each person. What are their strengths and areas for improvement? Are they looking for development opportunities? How do they prefer receiving feedback?

Should I ask the deputy for an overview of each person? What their current goals are, what their current 1-1s are focusing on, are they undergoing sickness or performance management? Or should I be forming my own opinion without asking the deputy for their views? Also, what questions could I ask in my first 1-1 with each team member?

Yes, you should ask the deputy for an overview on each person. You’ll form your own opinions based on your own observations, but it’ll help you get up to speed faster to hear their perspective too.

When you do initial one-on-ones with each team member, I find it helpful to ask things like:

  • What are the most important things for you to achieve this year? Are you on track to doing that? Are there milestones to meet on the way? What things are you worried might get in the way?
  • What’s your most pressing project this week / this month? (Follow-up questions should stem naturally from this — about context, timeline, steps, etc.)
  • What would help you do your job better? Any obstacles you’re encountering that you need help with?
  • Is there anything I should know about how you like to work?
  • What’s worrying you most right now with your work?

5. Is this job opening a scam?

I recently (as in, an hour ago) applied to a local landscaping job — one that actually pays fairly generously for the level of work. As soon as I hit “apply” (this was an Indeed posting), I got an automated message from them inviting me to call and set up a remote interview.

Within half an hour, I received both text messages and phone calls from the company. The text message asked if I was available for a quick call; the phone call was shunted to my voicemail because I was driving and they did not leave a message.

I’ve been applying to jobs for a year and I hardly ever get so much as an email telling me I’ve been rejected. All of this seems very fishy, at the least. And I’ve seen three one-star reviews for the company on Google (which were all left without any accompanying text) which the owner responded to saying that they had been applicants. Am I wrong to think that something feels very wrong here?

Yes, it’s most likely a scam. It might not be; you could certainly do a call with them and learn more to be sure, but just follow normal anti-scam hygiene, meaning don’t give them your bank account details or other personal info until you’ve established they’re legitimate, don’t agree to deposit any checks for them, be skeptical if they “hire” you without a real interview, etc.

Related:
I received a job offer — and it was a scam

is it rude to ask what someone does for a living?

A reader writes:

I left the workforce a few years ago to become a stay-at-home parent. I loved working and thus love hearing about other people’s work. When meeting someone new (often another parent my age), I sometimes ask, “So, what field are you in?” or “So, do you work or go to school, or are you home with the kids?” This often leads to further conversation like how they became interested in their field, where they work and if we might have mutual connections in our small, rural area (e.g., “Oh, you work at [employer]? Do you know my cousin [name]?”) Or, if the person is a SAHM like myself, this opens up an entirely different and equally satisfying convo about motherhood.

I find most people receptive to this question and that it leads to interesting and pleasant conversation, but I recently read that inquiring “What do you do?” can be perceived as rude because you could be attempting to make a value judgment on someone’s career or perceived income. Is career off-limits for discussion unless the person themself brings it up? Is there a graceful way I can ask someone about their work while signaling genuine interest and not malicious intent?

Ha, well, you’re asking someone who grew up in and is now back in the Washington, D.C. area, where that is always the first question anyone asks. (Sometimes it’s power-mongering, but it’s also that this is an area with a lot of people in wonky or niche jobs that they’re really passionate about and spend a lot of time doing.) When I moved to the Pacific Northwest at one point, I was surprised to discover that people could know each for months before their jobs ever came up. So there can be a regional component — and if you notice you’re the only one who ever asks it, that can be useful info about the culture you in.

To give a more general answer, though: there are people who hate being asked what they do — because they feel they’re going to be judged on their answer, or because they dislike talking about work, or because they don’t want to be defined by their job. But it can also be a very common question, and the fact that you’re finding most people are receptive to it and it leads to interesting conversations is a data point in favor of not feeling like you can’t ask.

Since you’re thinking about it, though, your wording of “So, do you work or go to school, or are you home with the kids?” is probably useful for signaling that you’re not trying to use the person’s professional status to evaluate whether they’re worth your time to talk to. You could also add, “Or what keeps you busy?” so that if someone wants to talk about their hobbies instead of their work, it’s clear you’d welcome that too.

my office’s second-in-command is sabotaging the CEO

A reader asks:

I am an upper level manager in a mid-sized company. This past year, our CEO retired after decades in leadership. I used to report to him, but in the changeover it was decided that I would report to the second-in-command, Sally, who had wanted the top job but didn’t get it.

Sally is extremely toxic, but our former CEO had a soft spot for her and has painted her in a very positive light to the new CEO, Kate. While Kate gets acclimated, she has delegated much of the day-to-day work to Sally.

However, Sally is actively lying about a lot of things, to many different people, with the seeming intent to set up Kate to fail. For example, at a recent meeting Sally was leading, she gave us specific examples of ongoing work happening and encouraged us to conduct similar work in our own departments. But when I followed up with the people supposedly working on these very specific tasks, they had no idea what I was talking about. Another example: Kate believes Sally to be organizing and running a series of important meetings but Sally is not running those meetings, nor does she attend most of them, though Kate clearly thinks she has been. Sally also has a habit of scheduling meetings, then canceling them one minute before or just not showing up at all, with no explanation, but she reports back as if she has attended. She also presents herself as giving specific directives from Kate, but those instructions often contradict things Kate has said to directly us. Meanwhile, I’m getting a sense that some non-management staff, who aren’t as clued in to this dynamic, are starting to get disgruntled with Kate’s leadership.

We fear Kate will think we are all a bunch of disgruntled employees not being flexible if we try to clue her in. But we all really like Kate and want her to succeed!

I have some one-on-one contact with Kate but she is extremely busy so it’s been limited. There are others with more clout who are at the end of their tether with Sally but are reluctant to put themselves on the line. What on earth do we do?

I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

my boss has been taken over by AI

A reader writes:

I don’t think there’s necessarily a solution to this, but I’m fascinated to hear other people’s experiences.

My boss is obsessed with AI. To the point where he’s adopted it as his entire personality.

It’s just me and him working in a very small nonprofit, although we have a large pool of volunteers and clients that use our services. If it helps, he’s new to the area (and the job) and we were already a close-knit team before he joined, so there’s an element of him being the newbie that I try to be sensitive to.

But OH MY GOD he uses AI to write EVERYTHING. And I mean simple text messages about booking a maintenance guy for our building. He seems totally incapable of just saying words in a comprehensible order without the use of ChatGPT. (I can’t help but wonder what he did three years ago, before it was invented.)

The overall effect is … odd. Any written communication from him has all the hallmarks of AI that you’d be familiar with — the weirdly symmetrical cadence, and a lot of “it’s not just X, it’s Y.” Six paragraphs when two would do. Random phrases highlighted in bold. That sort of thing.

A lot of our clients are vulnerable, and building close relationships with them is really important to the job. I can tell a lot of them have almost no clue what he’s saying to them, and he seems to be struggling to get to know people. I think his obviously-not-human writing style might be contributing to it.

The bigger problem is where it impacts me, which is that having a computer do the writing for him means he has free rein to create endless fiddly ways of accomplishing very simple tasks.

We were recently thinking about which volunteers would be a good fit for a new project. He sent me a six-point list outlining our “approach to decision making,” talking about how we will adopt “a team approach to delivering the ask” and “take responsibility for ensuring it happens and delivers the results we need.” Honestly, a five minute face-to-face chat would have sorted it. (Ironically, we haven’t managed to decide which volunteer to approach because, surprise surprise, we don’t have time to work through the six-point list!)

I’ve mentioned it to a couple of the board trustees, who have all expressed frustration. It seems that everyone is really struggling to understand his vision for the role, and think he’s alienating people he should be building relationships with.

I’ve casually mentioned it to him and he’s gotten very defensive – I think maybe AI has become a bit of a crutch, as opposed to a productivity tool (it’s not just X, it’s Y!). He really believes that anything written by AI is better, and he couldn’t possibly do his job without it.

I don’t know if there’s a solution — he loves AI, he isn’t open to my feedback, and it’s really for the board of trustees to deal with.

But I’d be fascinated to know if any other readers are dealing with this “invasion of the AI bodysnatchers” problem, and is it impacting things like client relationships and task efficiency? When so much of the working world is about building relationships, surely it has to be?

You’re absolutely right that it’s a problem for the board to deal with, and if they’re not working on doing that, they’re being negligent. This isn’t just a new leader obsessed with a new technology that they don’t know how to use correctly; it sounds like serious and fundamental communication and relationship-building issues that are affecting your clients, as well as the staff (you). (It’s not just X, it’s Y!) And it goes to issues of judgment and general competence.

It’s good that you’ve talked to some of the board trustees, and it’s good that they’re seeing it too. Now they need to do something about it.

That’s not within your control, of course. But if I were advising them, I’d tell them they need to have a very candid conversation with him about their concerns, the impact of what he’s doing, and what needs to change — but I’d also tell them they need to look seriously at whether he’s the right person to be leading the organization. It often takes boards way too long to get to that last question, and the organization suffers in the meantime. They should start asking themselves that now.

I’d also ask them about what he’s good at. Sometimes you get an executive director who’s great at fundraising (or strategy, but most often you see this with fundraising) and not so great at the other parts of the job, and the board makes the calculation that the person’s fundraising expertise outweighs their weaknesses. But based on the picture you’ve painted, I’m doubtful he’s good at fundraising either (unless it’s all face-to-face with major donors and so he’s forced to speak like a normal person and not use ChatGPT to script himself, and if he happens to actually be good at that).

Anyway, happy to toss this out to readers to weigh in on any “invasion of the AI bodysnatchers” situations they’ve seen and what the consequences have been in their own organizations.