the truth about referrals, from someone in tech

A letter from someone in tech, writing about current job advice:

I work at a billion dollar+ publicly traded tech company that is known (incorrectly) for its great culture. People consider this a “dream job” without understanding that it is, in fact, a job like any other at a company just as bad as any other tech company.

All of the job advice out there in this miserable tech market is to network network network, you have to get your resume in front of a person, referrals are the only way in, etc. Which has resulted, for me, in even more requests for referrals from people I barely know. Dozens and dozens.

1. Our referral system requires me to define our relationship, give details about certain desirable qualities you have, and write a paragraph about why you’re a good fit. I can’t do that for someone I don’t know.

2. There is no way to not apply online. You have to apply online. I don’t know any other way to say it. You can ask me to pass along your resume but you still have to apply online. APPLY ONLINE.

3. Two of the last four people I hired applied online. Two were internal mobility. None were referrals.

4. I’m a senior director at this company and have less power than you think. I’ve referred at least 20 people. Fewer than five have even gotten a screening call. (I got a referral once from a C level executive for a spot on my team. We did not hire that person but we did interview them knowing we wouldn’t hire them.)

5. The idea that all recruiting is being done by AI and there are a bunch of magic ATS tricks is … not true. We do initial screening with AI, looking for specific knockout qualifications, but I read every resume (100+ for the last role I hired) forwarded to me by our recruiter. And every cover letter.

6. Because of all of the layoffs, recruiters are spoiled for choice. You can be an incredibly strong candidate and there is still someone who 100% fits a narrow set of criteria and you only 99% fit. You’re still amazing.

Tech is cyclical. Every 5-10 years, we do a “no one needs middle managers!” swing and then 5-10 years later, we go back to “the most important role in tech is actually middle managers” and then we do it all over again. This too shall pass. It was a job seeker’s market in 2020-2021 and now the overhiring is crashing up against the economy and we (workers) have lost our power. 0-1.5% merit increases this year tells you what you need to know.

It’s also the worst I’ve seen the market since I started working in 2006. Which is to say: The people giving you advice usually don’t know what they’re talking about, because this is the worst tech job market in 20 years. They’re making stuff up because they need something to talk about on LinkedIn. And this is why we love AAM.

my newly befriended coworker is a hoarder

A reader writes:

I have gotten friendly with my work colleague over the past year. We have many hobbies in common, including crafting.

We excitedly planned our first craft project at her house, which I’d never been to before. She lives in a very nice neighborhood, and I was stunned upon entering her large four-bedroom house that she seems to be a hoarder. It is piled with stuff everywhere — Christmas decorations piled in a corner in July, books and papers on every flat surface, etc. So as not to hurt her feelings, I stayed and did the craft project with her, but I was so uncomfortable the whole time (1.5 hours) and jammed out of there as quickly as I could.

Unfortunately, this project is a two-step project, so at work she has been asking me when I want to come back to finish! I don’t know what to do. She is very sweet and I don’t want to tell her why I can’t return. She is not in my department, so I only see her 1-2 times per week, but I can’t avoid her forever. I don’t mind being friends at work … I just don’t want to go to her house anymore! HELP!

Anyone who’s been inside a hoarder’s house would understand why you don’t want to go back; it’s not just a little clutter, but an environment that feels truly unclean.

I also understand why you don’t want to be straightforward with her! Hoarding is an extremely sensitive topic and you don’t have the sort of close relationship where it makes sense to take that on.

In theory, you don’t have to give your coworker a reason for why you don’t want to go back to her house. You could simply say you don’t think you’re going to be able to get back to the project. But this is also someone who you want to keep a warm working relationship with, and just abruptly pulling out with no explanation doesn’t sound like the vibe you want. In light of that, here are a few options:

1. Suggest finishing the project somewhere else, like at a coffeeshop. I’m guessing that if this were easy to do you’d have already thought of it, but it’s the simplest way to sidestep the whole thing. You could say, “Would you mind if we finished it somewhere else? I’ve realized I focus better outside of house hangouts.”

2. Your situation has changed and you won’t be able to finish:
* “I’ve gotten weirdly protective of my downtime lately, so I’m trying to keep my weekends simpler. I’m really glad we worked on it together though; I had fun!”
* “I’ve been burning out on crafting so I’m taking a break from it for now. I’m sorry for the timing!”
* Or something else is taking up most of your out-of-work time now, like helping a relative or studying for a class, or you’re overextended so not making any plans.

3. You were allergic to something in her house last time. If she has pets, blame them. Otherwise your allergies could have flared up from anything last time.

Personally, if I wanted to signal that I was still up for a work friendship, I think I’d say: “I’m having major craft burn-out so I don’t think I’ll end up getting back to it — finish it without me if you want to! But want to get lunch one day this week? I’d love to hear more about the X topic you were telling me about.”

my boss always cancels our meetings, a smelly coworker who I don’t know, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss always cancels our meetings

My manager is the CEO. They have eight direct reports, plus they are across projects — key clients, key projects.

They’re very busy, of course, but they constantly cancel / decline meetings with me, whether it’s a performance review, a briefing before a client meeting, or our weekly 1:1’s. I feel as though I’m constantly shunted for something else.

I can rationalize some kinds of meetings being canceled, but to what extent should I expect my weekly 1:1 with them be kept? I always thought that these meetings are the holy grail of manager-direct report relationships? Am I being sensitive and unreasonable?

The busier your manager, the more likely this is to happen — and generally you’re expected to just roll with it … and your quality of life will be higher if you choose to do that, rather than taking it personally. Your boss is juggling a zillion different competing priorities, and while your meetings are important, they often won’t be as urgent as other things coming at them.

The big question I have for you is whether these meetings (particularly the performance reviews and weekly one-on-one’s) get rescheduled. If they do, then yeah — this is just part of working for a busy CEO. If they don’t, that’s more of an issue and something you should raise, because you do need time with them in order to do your own job. Occasionally canceling a one-on-one without rescheduling it isn’t a big deal, but generally you should expect them to be rescheduled rather than canceled altogether. If that’s not happening, raise it and ask if there’s a better way to get the time with them you need.

Related:
my boss keeps canceling our meetings

2. A smelly coworker who I don’t know

I’ve read all your articles regarding coworkers/employees with hygiene issues. I have a slightly different problem. I work for a large government agency. As I’m sure you know, remote work has been almost completely ended for federal employees. My job has always been in person, but remote workers have been “assigned” to our building.

We now have random people assigned to sit in cubes mingled in established teams. Someone was assigned to the cube across the aisle from me. He has extremely bad body odor. I’m not sure what I can do to solve the problem since I don’t know him, or anything about him.

I’ve talked to my supervisor, but she doesn’t know what to do either. We don’t have HR in our building, but I could submit an HR ticket. That seems unkind because I think he deserves to have someone talk to him in person.

Is your boss able to figure out who this coworker works for and have a discreet word with the coworker’s boss, requesting that they handle it? If not, submit the HR ticket. You’re not well-positioned to talk to this employee yourself about such an awkward topic, and the set-up means this is the only real option you have. HR can still talk to him in person if they feel that’s the best way to handle it; you’re just alerting them that it’s necessary (and you can do that in a kind and empathetic way).

Related:
my boss told me that I smell

3. Did I make a bad impression when I complained to coworkers?

I just hit one year in an entry-level position at a remote, high-stress marketing start-up. There are definitely some structural issues unique to my position, such as being expected to pivot from project to project without warning and my manager living in another country, which has made getting projects reviewed more difficult. Recently on a work trip, I unintentionally vented some of my frustrations about the way my position has been handled over drinks with a couple coworkers on a different team, who have never mentioned it again — but I can’t help feeling like people are avoiding me.

Friends and family members have assured me that everyone complains a little at work. However, I’m concerned that I’ve now made my reputation as someone ungrateful who disparages their coworkers, especially in a remote position where we don’t often get face-to-face time. How do I remedy this potential social faux pas?

It’s true that most people complain at work now and then, although it’s also true that it’s possible to complain in a way that lands wrong with people (because the complaint seems out of touch, or you seem excessively bitter, or you seem more negative than positive in general, or you seemed to lack judgment in who you vented to or where you did it, or so forth). I can’t tell if that’s the case here, but regardless the best thing you can do is to make a point of being notably helpful, upbeat, and capable in your interactions with those people. That way their most recent interaction with you won’t be the one you’re concerned about and if you did leave them with a weird impression previously, that should help overwrite it (particularly if you then sustain that).

4. Will a sexy Halloween costume cause problems with future jobs?

Last year, I met a guy who is the sweetest person ever. It took a while for me to get comfortable, but now I’m totally in love and very happy. One day he mentioned that he has always wanted to go out for Halloween with a woman dressed in a sexy costume. This year Halloween is on a Saturday and most nightclubs will have a party.

I think a sexy night out in a revealing costume would be a ton of fun, and I’ve picked out two costumes. Both reveal some cleavage and my whole bum.

Where the anxiety kicks in for me is that nightclubs sometimes have photographers and also that other people have phones. I know this fear is irrational but what if someone takes my picture and then a future employer finds said photo and doesn’t want to hire me? I really want to have fun and live my life, but I can’t shake the feeling that I’d be risking future job prospects. At the same time, I don’t want to dress myself based on work. (For context I work in the safety department for a construction company in middle management.)

Should I be worried about an employer finding a photo that someone else took of me? Is it likely that my photo will be taken if I’m just another person in the crowd? If so, do you think I will not get jobs because of my butt showing in the pictures? I really want to do this and have a fun time.

It’s very unlikely that it would affect your chances of getting a future job, but not 100% impossible. There are hiring managers who google candidates and judge them if they find that type of photo. But if a photo of you in the costume does end up online, how likely is it that your name would be attached? I’d think you could solve this whole thing by just not giving out your name (or not giving your real name) to anyone with a camera who happens to ask, unless you are so well-known in your community that people will already know it.

That said, exposing your entire butt is fairly extreme even for a Halloween costume, and if that’s the part making you anxious, you could find plenty of revealing costumes that don’t do that.

5. Should I send thank-you notes after a phone screening?

I have about eight years engineering experience and am currently applying to other jobs in the industry. I get plenty of requests for phone screenings, which is the initial call with someone in HR, who then sends info on to the hiring manager for the second and third rounds. This is generally the point where conversation stops.

I know to send a thank-you email after the meeting the hiring manager. Should I be sending one after the phone call with HR? It felt redundant to me since I end the phone call by thanking them for their time, etc., but I wonder if that’s why I rarely seem to hear back.

It’s good practice to send an email after the HR screening, so yes. But it’s also probably not the reason you’re not hearing back; thank-you notes generally build on an impression you’ve already made, rather than being a make-or-break factor. You should do them because it’s an easy way to strengthen your candidacy (assuming they include something of substance and aren’t literally just a thank-you), but it’s also worth looking at how you’re approaching the phone screens themselves, in case it’s weakness there that’s preventing you from moving forward.

Related:
thank-you notes: they’re not about thanking anyone

can I publish and distribute my own articles about some interesting activities at work?

A reader writes:

Our internal company communications team writes great articles, but mostly informational vs. special interest. They have one of the largest teams in the company, mostly writers, and frankly most people have no idea what half of them do.

Twice now, I have approached this communications team with story ideas that my fellow coworkers and management agree sound compelling and fun about the lesser-known activities at work that are not confidential or sensitive, and twice I’ve been told “pitch us your idea and we’ll see if we have the bandwidth to address it” and then crickets. I even offered both times to write a detailed draft, hold the interviews, take the pictures, etc (having journalism in my background), and to ask that they edit as they see fit.

I’m one of the more senior in terms of years in service, and I’m starting to think I’m just going to do the work myself, write the piece, and then print it out and place it anonymously around our work areas. Note, I would ensure that if this “piece” left the site, there would be zero damaging information for our facility.

Could this backfire in a negative way? There’s nothing I’ve seen nor signed that says I can’t distribute internal communications, especially ones that are vetted and approved by the very people that will be interviewed.

Printing and distributing it anonymously risks reading as a little too much “underground newspaper but about fairly low-stakes things.”

I get that you’re frustrated that they’re not taking your ideas, but they may have good reasons for that (or just higher priorities that they need to write about for political or other reasons). Or they may get a lot of story suggestions from people who say they’ll write the pieces themselves but then don’t follow through, or who underestimate how much work would be involved or what competing priorities this team already has, or who turn in pieces that require a lot of editing, or who knows what. They also might just disagree, rightly or wrongly, that the story ideas fit in with their vision for what they produce.

But if you’re invested in getting the word out about these lesser-known activities, are there other ways to do that? Can you promote them through flyers, an intranet, or Slack channels? If you’re not particularly invested in that and are more just irritated that the other team isn’t using your ideas … well, you could ask them directly! You could say, “I’ve pitched a couple of ideas that I thought were in line with what you write about but they didn’t go anywhere, and I wondered if you can give me any insight into your process — is there a better way for staff to pitch ideas, or were these two just not in sync with your priorities right now, or what can I take away from this so that I’m better aligned with your process in the future?”

should we tell candidates we don’t negotiate job offers?

A reader writes:

My organization has been moving from a wild west approach to a much more structured one when it comes to salary. We have done a pay equity study, identified pay bands for different classifications, and have consistent cost-of-living factors that apply for different cities. In general, I feel way less stressed making compensation decisions in this new framework, as it reduces my anxiety about guessing wrong or not having all the info about fair market compensation.

However, we are also being advised to make firm offers only, with no room for negotiation. That’s for good reasons — to reduce inequities around who negotiates (or negotiates well) and who doesn’t. I support that goal and I understand the rationale. However, I also think that job seekers are increasingly advised to always negotiate, and I think it may turn off good candidates if we demonstrate no interest in meeting them partway. And if our competition isn’t doing this, can we really afford to be the “we don’t negotiate” firm?

The other way to do this would be to under-offer compared to what we’re willing to pay, assuming the candidate will negotiate. That’s nerve-wracking in its own way because they may be turned off by what looks like a lack of understanding of the market, but at least we could go up in response to their negotiation request.

I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • My employee got pulled over during a Zoom meeting
  • Employee has a “bugger off” sign on his door

my coworkers keep asking about my weight loss — and it’s not good news

A reader writes:

I have recently lost a significant amount of weight and it’s definitely noticeable. People regularly comment on it in a positive way — “oh my gosh! you look so great” — and similar comments. I know that the comments are well-intended and people mean it as a compliment.

Unfortunately, the weight loss is a result of some health issues that I’m working closely with multiple doctors to figure out. The potential diagnoses range from moderately serious but treatable, to very serious and life-altering. I don’t talk about it with anyone at work because I get emotional and start crying, and I don’t want to do that at work.

My usual response is to just say thank you and move on. Occasionally, someone will ask, “How did you do it?” I’m sure they’re looking for an answer like a specific diet plan or surgery or a shot. The first time it happened, I blurted out, “I’ve been really sick, but I don’t want to talk about it at work.” I started crying and had to walk away. The poor woman was horrified and I was super embarrassed to have caused a scene.

Any suggestions for how to respond to comments ranging from kind and complimentary to prying and nosy?

People really need to think about this more often.

If someone has new haircut or a fun shirt, you can generally assume it was an intentional choice and compliments will be welcome. Weight loss is not that way, and sometimes it is upsetting, stressful, or caused by something bad.

That said, if someone compliments you, I think you’re right to simply say thank you and move on; there’s no point in getting into it at work.

But I also don’t think you should be embarrassed by your response to the coworker who asked how you did it. If nothing else, she is now much less likely to put someone else in the same position in the future. However, these are some other ways you could say it in the future:

* “Nothing I want to get into at work, but it wasn’t intentional.”
* “Well, for me it’s health issues. Nothing I want to get into at work, though.”
* “I’ve been ill.”
* “You couldn’t have known, but it’s a health thing and might not be good news.”
* “You couldn’t have known, but it’s a health issue.”
* “Stress and health problems, mostly!”

All of these reveal more information than you should have to reveal at work. So if you prefer, you could also say something like, “Honestly, it’s my least favorite conversation right now. But how is ___ (subject change)?”

(Also, “how did you do it?” is such a weird reflex for people in this situation! They already know the relatively limited range of possible answers. No one is going to answer with, “I found a box of magic beans behind the building and there are still some there if you want to grab them.”)

I hope your letter will be a PSA reminding people not to assume all weight loss is good news or welcome.

I don’t want my boss to answer my questions with AI, is it true that no one gets fired, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. How to tell my boss I want his expertise, not AI

I switched careers a few years ago, and am in a job I love at a small company with great coworkers. My industry relies a lot on expertise. When I am working with a client, they expect me to be an expert and have knowledge of industry best practices, case studies, etc. One of the reasons I enjoy working at my company is that my boss has built up significant expertise over a long career, and has incredibly valuable insights. As I continue in my career I am excited to develop my own expertise, but he is a great resource for helping me understand the best way to present things and where to start when I’m digging in on a problem.

However, recently he has gotten extremely excited about AI. Every question I bring to him, he suggests asking AI or consults AI himself and sends me the output. When I talk about things related to marketing or client relationships, his first suggestion is always to use AI to do it. On one project recently, I asked him to review a report I wrote to ensure that it aligned with his thoughts and our client’s needs, and he suggested that instead I ask AI. I don’t want to ask AI — AI does not have the expertise I need that will help me learn, improve, and advance in my career.

I want to kindly and respectfully tell him that when I ask for his thoughts or insights, I am interested in learning from his expertise — that in fact one of the most valuable resources I have in learning to do my job is access to his deep well of experience — and that AI is not an appropriate substitute. I’m afraid if I try to do this it will come off as smug (or I’ll just yell I DIDN’T ASK AI I ASKED YOU!!). Do you have any suggestions on how to approach this?

When you approach him with questions, can you first say, “I did my own searches on this, but I’d really love to hear your thoughts from your own experience”?

If that doesn’t work and he keeps suggesting or citing AI anyway, I think you can say, “I appreciate those suggestions, but I find your thoughts from you so much more helpful than AI. It’s your expertise and experience that has been most useful to me, so I am hoping to hear straight from you on this if you’re willing!”

Related:
I think my boss is ChatGPT

2. My positive reference was actually negative

Last year, I lost my job. Between a long overdue mental breakdown that coincided with an extremely traumatic family tragedy, my work quality degraded rapidly and I was fired. Before that, I was an exemplary employee who had fantastic reviews (which I have copies of) and my manager had even called me a rock star of an employee. Since then I’ve been in therapy and on medication, and I’ve done a lot of work and reflecting to make sure that I never have a situation like that occur again.

When I started applying to jobs again, I asked a former coworker who I was close with if they could be a reference. I had known them for the entire time I was at my previous job, and they had even supported me through a lot of the bad that preceded my firing. When I asked them to be my reference, we had an incredibly warm and positive catch-up, and they sounded enthusiastic and excited to be my reference.

As it turns out, they have given an incredibly negative and untrue reference, and I believe there are at least three jobs that they have prevented me from either moving forward in the process with or getting an offer from. I only discovered this recently, and to say I’m devastated would be an understatement. I’m mortified I had no idea and let this go on this long — they genuinely seemed to want me to succeed, and never said they had reservations about me and my previous work. Had they, I would’ve used someone else.

While I understand that I probably can’t do anything for the jobs that already rejected me, I’m wondering if it was alright for me to reach out to a current job I’m in the process of interviewing with and ask to switch out their reference. I’m also wondering if there’s any way this could affect my reputation — I applied to multiple jobs across different departments at the same place (all within my experience and ability), and I have a rather unique name. There’s a large chance I may run into them or have to work with them in the future, depending on where I end up. I want to think I’m not the center of the universe and no one will remember me, but I’m spiraling a bit after this.

How awful. I do think you can swap out the reference; you’re just better off doing it in a way that doesn’t sound mysterious and or make them curious if there’s a story there. I’d say something like, “Katrina Mulberry has been hard to reach, so I’d like to replace her on my reference list with Nicolina Plufferon, whose contact info is…”

In addition, would you consider contacting the former coworker and asking what’s up? It’s reasonable to tell them that they assured you they would give you a strong reference, you offered their name on that basis, and you were taken aback to find that wasn’t the case, and you’re wondering if there’s something you misunderstood from your conversation or if there are issues from your work relationship that the two of you should sort out. Maybe that will spark some honesty from them about what’s going on on their end of this.

3. Fixing “grade inflation” in performance evaluations

I work for state government and have a team of nine people reporting to me indirectly. They have all been with my department for 15-20 years. I had an assistant supervisor (AS) who was their direct manager, who is now retiring and won’t be replaced. The AS has done the team’s reviews until now, and I would review and sign off.

I started six years ago, and I always felt that the AS was overrating the team on reviews, giving everyone exceptional ratings when only some of the team deserved them. I didn’t push back except in specific circumstances where an individual was notably underperforming.

Is there any way now to bring reviews back in to reality? I’m worried that anyone receiving an acceptable rating now after years of outstanding is going to freak out and wonder what changed about their performance when, really, nothing has.

Key context: the staff is union, so reviews don’t affect their salaries. Also, since everyone has been here so long, and these roles are remote, it’s unlikely (though not impossible) they’ll be leaving the role except by retirement.

Yeah, people aren’t going to like it. They’re especially not going to like it because you’ve been signing off on their reviews all along — it’s not like you’re a brand new manager coming in with a new way of doing things. They’re understandably going to wonder why you didn’t fix it earlier if you thought it needed to be fixed.

In any case, my advice is to make sure you’re calibrating your ranking system with how the rest of your organization, or at least your department or division, does things. If the change would have you rating your team on a much more critical scale than everyone else is using, that’s going to be a hard sell, and I’d question whether you should be doing it at all (especially when it wasn’t pressing enough to do it earlier).

But if your recalibration would get the ratings back in line with other teams in your area, that’s something you can explain. People still won’t like it, but you can explain the definitions the wider organization uses for “exceptional,” “acceptable,” etc. and that you’re going to be adhering to that system going forward. Be up-front that it means some people will see their ratings change, explain why you think it’s a useful change despite that, and be very clear about what “exceptional” does (and doesn’t) look like.

4. Is it true that no one ever gets fired or even managed?

For the last several years I’ve been on the same team, reporting to the same manager. He is a textbook example of hands-off to the point of negligence. There is no accountability on our team. Our manager announces new initiatives and people follow or don’t as they like, with no apparent consequences. Obviously, I don’t know what he says to other team members in their meetings, but there have been no visible behavior changes over 3+ years so I’m no longer inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

My manager has said to me multiple times, “I wish Eve and Nadine would do this…” or “I wish Ian and Roarke wouldn’t do this…” and it’s frustrating to me because a) all four of those people report to him and b) I have no management role. I am, in fact, less tenured than those people. He’s also said on numerous occasions that we’re all leaders and leaders don’t need to be micromanaged. I personally think people shouldn’t be managed based on their title alone, but that’s beside the point. I know my manager sucks and won’t change.

My question is: is it like this everywhere? I was talking to a work friend, who is more experienced and who I generally trust, about some of the specific frustrations lately and said I was thinking of looking for a new job. One where, hopefully, there is some accountability and if people don’t follow through on basic parts of the job, then there are consequences of some sort — up to and even including firing people when necessary. My friend said that doesn’t happen.

She said that once people get a job, they only leave if they want to. She said that this kind of management is everywhere, and people at our level “shouldn’t need to be managed” so it just doesn’t happen. For reference, “our level” is essentially lower-middle management. We’re not people leaders, but we’re on that level.

Is this true? There are aspects of my job that I like; I’d hate to leave and give those up just to end up somewhere else that also has no metrics for success and no accountability on the team, but also no flexibility in working from home and in my schedule, which are two perks of my current role I really value. If this is a common management style I might stick around longer, at least until the job market looks up.

No, it’s not true. “Once people get a job, they only leave if they want to” is a pretty incredible take!

It might be true at your organization, which is why someone who also works there is telling you that. But it’s not true in general. People get fired! People get given feedback and told to change and are otherwise held accountable, including lower-middle managers. There are places where that doesn’t happen — enough of them that it’s something to look at critically when you’re job-searching — but it’s absolutely not the case that it’s the norm.

You just have a bad manager (and maybe a bad employer if most managers there function like your boss does).

5. I can’t use the bathroom if I forget my work badge

I work in a trailer outside our main building. Since the trailer lacks a restroom, we must leave it and enter the main building to use the facilities. We used to access the main building through a key fob or access code, but they recently switched access to only a work badge. So now, if I forget my work badge, I can’t use the restroom. Is this legal?

Not if they don’t have a system in place to ensure you can get access some alternate way. OSHA regulations require  “prompt access” to bathrooms, and restrictions on that access can’t cause extended delays or create “unnecessary barriers.” If forgetting your work badge causes an extensive wait to access the bathroom (or if you can’t access it at all), it likely violates OSHA. (That said, your employer could legally discipline or even fire you for repeatedly forgetting your badge; you just need to have bathroom access meanwhile.)

how to explain a short notice period when it will be clear I’ve known I’m leaving for a while

A reader writes:

I’ll be going to school full-time starting this summer and will be giving two weeks notice soon.

I’ve known for several months but haven’t told my employer because my boss is mildly toxic. Until this point, my boss would say we’ve had a good working relationship. However, I realized early on that she can be quite judgmental and manipulative and will sabotage others to make herself look better. I learned how to stay on her good side to protect my working situation until I could leave.

I fully expect her to take my resignation personally and that she will be at minimum passive-aggressive towards me during the notice period.

I also know she will ask why I didn’t give more notice since I’ve obviously known for a while that I’m enrolling in school, and I’m not sure how I should handle that. I don’t plan on using her as a reference, but don’t want to burn a bridge either. I’m leaning towards saying something about the uncertainty of the economy and wanting to keep my options open.

A boss who’s a jerk about people leaving won’t respond well to you saying you wanted to keep your options open. To her that will sound like you intentionally hid something so you could act in your own interests with no consideration for hers — which is a pretty normal thing to do when you’re leaving a job, particularly one with a vindictive boss, but she doesn’t sound like someone who will see it reasonably.

Instead you should say that you just made the decision recently and told her as soon as you decided for sure. That’s not that different from “keeping my options open” but it’s likely to land better.

You also don’t even need to tell her that you’re going back to school if that’s the crux of what will upset her (since with school, it’s more obvious that you knew long before you told her). You could say you are taking time to decide your next move, or have some family things to deal with, or even that you’re moving to another job (and if she asks what job, you can say you’re not sharing it publicly yet). Ultimately it’s really not her business why you’re leaving if you’d prefer not to share it, and you’re not obligated to provide full disclosure to someone who you know will use her position of power to punish you for it.

Keep in mind, too, that you don’t need to offer up any reason when you let her know you’re leaving. You can simply say, “I’ve made the difficult decision to resign my position, and my last day will be (date).” It’s common for managers to ask what you’ll be doing next (normally just out of basic human warmth and interest) so she probably will ask — at which point you could use one of the options above because it would sound oddly chilly to flatly refuse to answer and you’re trying to stay on good terms. But you don’t need to offer the reason right out of the gate, either.

candidate accepted our job offer, then backed out … and is now applying again

A reader asks:

Recently, my organization was hiring for a manager position. Our top candidate initially accepted, but then declined the offer before starting because his current employer offered him more money and a higher position to stay there. It was disappointing, but we understood he had to do what was best for him, and our second choice was only second by a hair and we got a great new hire.

Fast forward a few months, and we are now looking for a senior manager. This former candidate has reached out to inquire about this position. I’d like to green-light an interview with the hiring panel, but I’m conflicted.

This person has great qualifications for the job. And, in fact, I believe the somewhat junior nature of the previous position may have been a factor in his decision to remain with his current company. Had I known the senior position would be available back when I was hiring for the first one, I’d have made this candidate an offer for the senior position without question.

But even though I understand his reasoning, accepting and then pulling out of the offer left somewhat of a bad taste in my mouth. Frankly, I don’t want to go through the same process, make him another offer, and again be used to leverage himself into an even better position with his current company. I also don’t want to look desperate, for lack of a better word. We can find another great candidate, given sufficient time, but this person did click with everyone during the prior interview process.

Obviously, if we interview him for this position, we will inquire as to why he has again thrown his hat in the ring to work for us immediately after using our offer to get a promotion and a raise, but: (1) is even entertaining hiring him a bad idea, and (2) assuming it’s not a terrible idea, what are some good questions to ask to guard against wasting our time?

I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

can I put an “eat the rich” bumper sticker on the car I park at work?

A reader writes:

I work on a fundraising team in a decidedly non-fundraising capacity. I don’t interface with donors and my work doesn’t touch them either. It’s more of a support role for the fundraisers, but with several layers between us.

I imagine that if I put a bumper sticker on my car that said “eat the rich” and parked it at work that this would be a problem. But could I get fired for it? Could I be asked to remove it? Note that I’m not actually advocating for murder and cannibalism. The full quote is attributed to Jean-Jacques Rousseau in response to the French revolution and advocates for shared resources: “When the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich.”

Well, it’s a bigger deal in your job and your organization than in lots of others, because your organization relies on people with money to fund its work (and while sometimes fundraising means lots of small-dollar donors, for most nonprofits the goal is to amass a slate of wealthy donors who will fund your work at a significant level). So you’re attacking the people they rely on to do their work — and to give you a paycheck. Your job depends on the rich people you’re advocating eating — and if any of those donors ever visit your office, having an anti-rich-people slogan in the parking lot is a weird impression to give. (Would any of them actually care? Maybe not. But an organization that depends on them to exist isn’t likely to want to chance it.)

So it’s not that the sentiment is so outrageous. It’s that choosing to express it in your particular job would look like bad judgment.

As for potential consequences: yes, you could be fired for it. In the U.S., in every state except Montana, employers can fire you for anything they want, as long as the firing is not (a) because of your race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, or other protected class, (b) in retaliation for exercising a legally protected workplace right, such as reporting harassment or discrimination, (c) in violation of a handful of other very narrow protections (for instance, you can’t be fired for organizing around wages and working conditions), or (d) in violation of the terms of an employment contract, which most American workers don’t have. Outside of those categories, they can fire you for pretty much anything. They could fire you because you had a Maroon 5 bumper sticker on your car, or because your shirt was ugly, or because you like Marmite. Generally employers don’t do that because it would make them a terrible place to work and they want to be able to attract and retain good employees and that kind of turnover would be awfully disruptive, but in theory they could.

More likely, though, they’d just tell you that the bumper sticker is likely to be off-putting to the donors who fund the work that pays you, and they’d ask you to remove it. If you refused … well, they could fire you over it. It’s more likely that they’d just think that, given where you work, it showed bad judgment and you’d lose respect at work (which can affect things like what projects you get and if you can get promoted and whether you’ll be the first name they think of if they need to lay someone off). And that stuff might all end up being true even if no one directs asks you to remove it.

Basically, it’s likely to use up capital that you’d probably rather spend on other things, and keeping it if you were asked to remove it would look like a weird hill to die on (which in turn would add to the social cost).

Ultimately, that bumper sticker isn’t going to drive any actual social change and it’s hard to see it as worth the price.